Royal expert shares tragic verdict on Kate Middleton – accusing palace of not protecting her

The photo posted by Kate Middleton on Mother’s Day is still causing a stir because it was unpublished shorty after due to editing.

“Professional photographer here. Look closely at Princess Charlotte’s wrist. This is what happens when you composite layers in Photoshop. I’m not speculating on why the photo was edited like this, but it’s weird,” portrait photographer Martin Bamford wrote on X.

The Princess took “the blame” for manipulating the photo.

“Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother’s Day. C.”, she wrote on her and William’s official X account.

After that, Kensington Palace confirmed it “would not be reissuing the original unedited photograph of Kate and her children.”

The Associated Press, Reuters, Getty Images, and Agence France-Presse all decided to issue “kill notices,” which are advisory notices to remove or not use a specific photo.

“It appears that the source has manipulated the image,” the Associated Press notification read.
Additionally, they released a statement, saying, “The Associated Press initially published the photo, which was issued by Kensington Palace. The AP later retracted the image because at closer inspection, it appears that the source had manipulated the image in a way that did not meet AP’s photo standards. The photo shows an inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand.”

The royal expert Katie Nicholl shared that the Palace would be under much pressure following the issue with the photo.

“What’s so major in all of this is that four international picture agencies have killed this image. That’s really rare,” Nicholl said.“I can’t think of a a time since I’ve been doing this job for the best part of 15 years where a royal image has been recalled. So that’s highly unusual. It might force Kensington Palace’s hand.”

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Media Show,AFP’s global news director, Phil Chetwynd, said that Kensington Palace is no longer a trusted source.

“No, absolutely not. Like with anything, when you’re let down by a source the bar is raised … We sent out notes to all our teams at the moment to be absolutely super more vigilant about the content coming across our desk — even from what we would call trusted sources,” he said, according to Deadline.

Related Posts

Check hmmm .. Nice ..:)

Approaching women can be a nerve-wracking experience for many men.However, with the right mindset and approach,it can become an enjoyable and successful endeavor. Here are some techniques…

Confusing Photos That Will Make You Look Twice

From odd angles to perfect timing, these photos reveal just how easily our eyes can be deceived. As you go through them, consider this: If you’re perplexed,…

After more than ten years of saving for nose surgery, you’ll be stunned by the results

Devyn Aiken has felt since she was a young child that people notice her nose first, and not in a positive way. She wondered how different life…

Congress Preparing To Debate Crime Bill Amid Trump’s DC Crackdown

Lawmakers are preparing for a forthcoming crime bill from the White House as President Donald Trump continues his efforts to combat crime in Washington, D.C. On Wednesday,…

Woman shares pics of her husband giving birth

A couple’s deeply personal journey to parenthood has ignited a heated discussion online after they shared photos of a transgender man giving birth. While many applauded the…

Viva Las Vegas: Bloopers and mistakes you might missed

Elvis Presley is one of those American icons you just can’t replicate. His electrifying chemistry with Ann-Margret lit up the screen in the 1964 film Viva Las…